A9 PREDICT

A9 Predict

Changelog

Changes associated with this build.
v0.2.0Build identifier supplied

Build date · Eastern: Oct 25, 2026, 1:41:30.352 PM EDT

Technical build details
Commit
ef695042b6cc7b8d0132bc9eb2a0a1890d123d57
Version source
Running build metadata

Build metadata does not confirm production deployment or service health.

v0.2.0 This build

Keep this round's issued prediction readable, with a separate fresh entry comparison when matching evidence is available.

Added

  • One-contract entry estimate from matching fresh forecast, quote, depth and timestamped series fees; no orders are placed.
  • Current Kalshi round, threshold, close countdown and timestamped public quotes, separate from immutable A9 forecasts.
  • Eastern-day count of unique rounds with acknowledged forecasts and saved settlement status; real trades remain unavailable without fills.

Fixed

  • Saved history stays historical, including records from an open round; it does not show a current pick or start quote refreshes.
  • An issued prediction stays visible until its round closes, with its original probability and an explicit stale-input label after freshness expires.
  • Invalid reference timestamps, conflicting records and different-round quotes cannot supply a selection or entry comparison.
  • Forecast-only pilots can use the approved budget while learning stays off.
  • Quotes retire when stale, closed, mismatched or incomplete; an old forecast is never relabeled as current.
  • Bounded response parsing and shared in-flight public reads prevent simultaneous viewers multiplying upstream work.

Changed

  • Target prices spell out At least versus Above from the contract comparison; original Kalshi wording and rules remain in Details.
  • Untracked no-pick counts and the absence of a trading connection are labeled explicitly instead of appearing as a temporary data outage.
  • Canonical ACE9 Living Glass theme, compact historical evidence, and Eastern Time throughout.
  • Accessible version dialog groups Added, Fixed and Changed notes for this exact build.
  • Page reads do not start forecast collection, learning or order execution.

Tracked question

Will Russia enter Mykolaivka by September 30, 2026?

A9 gives this a 9% chance of happening. That's about the same as the betting market (8%). A9 researched this on the web before forecasting.

Market 8%Polymarket
A9 Predict 9%high confidence

Jev on its own said 14%

+1 pts vs market
Leans NO

Why A9 thinks this

The evidence, separated.

Web research · quality 55/100

The market’s resolution hinge is narrowly procedural and depends on whether ISW (or, if ISW is unavailable, DeepStateMap) shades any part of the specified Mykolaivka coordinates under any qualifying Russian-control/advance/infiltration layer and that shading persists through the next ISW daily update cycle. Open reporting through late August–early September 2026 documents intensified Russian probes and some localized fighting around Mykolaivka but also reports Ukrainian clearing operations and no confirmed sustained Russian control inside the settlement through those reports. The most important unknown is whether Russian forces will shift to a seizure-and-hold operation (or otherwise establish persistent on-the-ground control) that ISW will assess and shade before the September 30, 2026 cutoff. Given the short time window (three days from today) and the requirement that map shading persist through ISW’s next daily update cycle, the market’s resolution depends primarily on whether ISW’s daily mapping records persistent Russian shading over the exact coordinates in that timeframe. ([storymaps.arcgis.com](https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6a6f5a9448496de641cf64bd375))

For

ISW’s interactive map is the primary resolution source for this market and maintains layers that can mark ‘Assessed Russian Control’, ‘Assessed Russian Advance’, and ‘Assessed Russian Infiltration Areas’ that would qualify a shading over the Mykolaivka coordinates for a “Yes” resolution; those map layers exist and are the explicit mechanism named in the market rules. ([storymaps.arcgis.com](https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6a6f5a9448496de641cf64bd375))

Open-source reporting summarized by market trackers notes sustained and intensified Russian pressure on the Mykolaivka / Sloviansk axis since late July 2026, including small-unit infiltrations and direct assaults on eastern outskirts and apartment blocks — activity pattern consistent with localized advances that could produce ISW shading if Russia obtains and holds parts of the settlement. ([polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com/event/will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-byptptpt-20260805154948089?utm_source=openai))

ISW’s own product definitions treat the ‘Assessed Russian Advance’ layer as areas where Russian forces have operated in or conducted attacks against even if they do not maintain control, meaning some types of verified operations near or inside a settlement can produce qualifying map shading if ISW assesses and shades them. ([understandingwar.org](https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-updates/?utm_source=openai))

DeepStateMap.live is an accepted secondary resolution source (explicitly named in the market rules) and is regularly used by open-source analysts for near–real-time territorial control depiction, providing an independent reference if ISW is unavailable. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykolaivka%2C_Novohrodivka_urban_hromada%2C_Pokrovsk_Raion%2C_Donetsk_Oblast?utm_source=openai))

Against

Multiple independent summaries and reporting through late August–September 2026 (as collated by public trackers) report Ukrainian units conducting clearing operations inside Mykolaivka, detaining or capturing Russian personnel, and denying sustained Russian presence inside the settlement as of early–mid September 2026; those reports imply no confirmed, sustained Russian control that would produce qualifying ISW shading up to that reporting date. ([polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com/event/will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-byptptpt-20260805154948089/will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-by-december-31-2026-20260805154948091?utm_source=openai))

ISW’s map updates are daily and require shading to persist through a full ISW daily update cycle to count — temporary probes, ephemeral infiltrations, or brief contacts that are later cleared by Ukrainian forces may not persist long enough to generate the continuous shading the market requires. ([storymaps.arcgis.com](https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6a6f5a9448496de641cf64bd375))

Open-source summaries highlight that Russian advances in the sector through summer 2026 were largely incremental and characterized by probes rather than large committed formations capable of both seizing and holding an urban settlement immediately; that operational pattern works against a rapid, guaranteed capture by the short (three-day) window to September 30, 2026. ([polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com/event/will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-byptptpt-20260805154948089?utm_source=openai))

Unknown

Whether Russian forces will transition from probing/infiltration tactics to a committed seizure-and-hold operation (or Russia will secure de facto control via local actions) over Mykolaivka that ISW will assess and shade as persistent ‘Assessed Russian Control/Advance/Infiltration’ before or on September 30, 2026 — and whether that shading will persist through the next full ISW daily update cycle.

What would change A9's mind

  • ISW publishes a daily map update that shades any part of the coordinates 48.854785° N, 37.770676° E under ‘Assessed Russian Control’, ‘Assessed Russian Advance’, ‘Assessed Russian Infiltration Areas’, or ‘Assessed Russian Gains in the Past 24 Hours’ and that shading persists through the next ISW daily update cycle (this directly produces a “Yes” resolution). ([storymaps.arcgis.com](https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6a6f5a9448496de641cf64bd375))
  • Ukrainian forces publicly and verifiably clear and hold the coordinate area with corroborated geolocated evidence and ISW does not shade the coordinate as Russian-controlled or advanced through an ISW update cycle (this supports a “No” resolution if no qualifying shading appears by the cutoff). ([polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com/event/will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-byptptpt-20260805154948089/will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-by-december-31-2026-20260805154948091?utm_source=openai))
  • ISW becomes unavailable or its map rendering is disrupted and DeepStateMap.live (the designated backup) depicts sustained Russian control shading over the coordinate through its update cycle (market rules allow DeepStateMap if ISW is unavailable). ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykolaivka%2C_Novohrodivka_urban_hromada%2C_Pokrovsk_Raion%2C_Donetsk_Oblast?utm_source=openai))
  • A negotiated, physically enforced transfer of control on the ground (not merely an announced settlement) results in Russia actually holding the territory at the coordinate prior to the deadline — that outcome qualifies per the market rules even if ISW shading lags, provided the physical control is evident and corroborated. ([polymarket.com](https://polymarket.com/event/will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-byptptpt-20260805154948089?marketSlug=will-russia-enter-mykolaivka-by-september-30-2026-20260805154948090&outcomeIndex=0&utm_source=openai))
  • ISW skips one or more daily updates; in that case qualifying shading must persist until ISW’s next finalized update, so an apparent short-lived shading could be counted or discounted depending on ISW’s subsequent publication schedule. ([storymaps.arcgis.com](https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6a6f5a9448496de641cf64bd375))

Probability history

A9 never rewrites the past.

MarketA9Me
9%Initial read

The market’s resolution hinge is narrowly procedural and depends on whether ISW (or, if ISW is unavailable, DeepStateMap) shades any part of the specified Mykolaivka coordinates under any qualifying Russian-control/advance/infiltration layer and that shading persists through the next ISW daily update cycle. Open reporting through late August–early September 2026 documents intensified Russian probes and some localized fighting around Mykolaivka but also reports Ukrainian clearing operations and no confirmed sustained Russian control inside the settlement through those reports. The most important unknown is whether Russian forces will shift to a seizure-and-hold operation (or otherwise establish persistent on-the-ground control) that ISW will assess and shade before the September 30, 2026 cutoff. Given the short time window (three days from today) and the requirement that map shading persist through ISW’s next daily update cycle, the market’s resolution depends primarily on whether ISW’s daily mapping records persistent Russian shading over the exact coordinates in that timeframe. ([storymaps.arcgis.com](https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6a6f5a9448496de641cf64bd375))

a9-predict-0.3.0 · 33012ed8abcc58e1fefd1dc9aa081e1b79457f34576b648ae0f329529c665fec