A9 PREDICT

A9 Predict

Changelog

Changes associated with this build.
v0.2.0Build identifier supplied

Build date · Eastern: Oct 25, 2026, 1:41:30.352 PM EDT

Technical build details
Commit
ef695042b6cc7b8d0132bc9eb2a0a1890d123d57
Version source
Running build metadata

Build metadata does not confirm production deployment or service health.

v0.2.0 This build

Keep this round's issued prediction readable, with a separate fresh entry comparison when matching evidence is available.

Added

  • One-contract entry estimate from matching fresh forecast, quote, depth and timestamped series fees; no orders are placed.
  • Current Kalshi round, threshold, close countdown and timestamped public quotes, separate from immutable A9 forecasts.
  • Eastern-day count of unique rounds with acknowledged forecasts and saved settlement status; real trades remain unavailable without fills.

Fixed

  • Saved history stays historical, including records from an open round; it does not show a current pick or start quote refreshes.
  • An issued prediction stays visible until its round closes, with its original probability and an explicit stale-input label after freshness expires.
  • Invalid reference timestamps, conflicting records and different-round quotes cannot supply a selection or entry comparison.
  • Forecast-only pilots can use the approved budget while learning stays off.
  • Quotes retire when stale, closed, mismatched or incomplete; an old forecast is never relabeled as current.
  • Bounded response parsing and shared in-flight public reads prevent simultaneous viewers multiplying upstream work.

Changed

  • Target prices spell out At least versus Above from the contract comparison; original Kalshi wording and rules remain in Details.
  • Untracked no-pick counts and the absence of a trading connection are labeled explicitly instead of appearing as a temporary data outage.
  • Canonical ACE9 Living Glass theme, compact historical evidence, and Eastern Time throughout.
  • Accessible version dialog groups Added, Fixed and Changed notes for this exact build.
  • Page reads do not start forecast collection, learning or order execution.

Tracked question

US-Iran Hormuz Agreement by September 30?

A9 gives this a 7% chance of happening. That's about the same as the betting market (7%). A9 researched this on the web before forecasting.

Market 7%Polymarket
A9 Predict 7%moderate confidence

Jev on its own said 11%

+1 pts vs market
Leans NO

Why A9 thinks this

The evidence, separated.

Web research · quality 60/100

As of Sept 24, 2026 there is credible reporting of renewed, mediated shuttle diplomacy on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and public Iranian statements that Tehran could reopen the Strait of Hormuz within days if the United States eases military pressure and lifts a naval blockade. There is also prior precedent (a June 2026 MOU) and active technical discussions. However, Iran’s offer is explicitly conditional on U.S. actions that are politically and operationally difficult to implement quickly and require clear, public U.S. acceptance of an agreement. The market’s resolution standard demands unambiguous acceptance announcements by both countries of the same diplomatic instrument; that threshold is higher than the existence of mediated talks or conditional offers. Overall the sources show momentum toward diplomacy but also significant political and implementation obstacles that make a clear, jointly announced bilateral diplomatic agreement by Sept 30 uncertain. The single largest uncertainty is whether the U.S. will publicly take the specific steps Iran demands and both sides will issue the unambiguous, matching acceptance statements required by the market within the six‑day window.

For

Direct mediated contacts resumed on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly (shuttle talks, Sept 22–23, 2026) between U.S. envoys (reported as Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner) and Iran’s delegation (Abbas Araghchi), showing renewed diplomatic engagement. (Reuters/market coverage).

Iran publicly told Reuters it could reopen the Strait of Hormuz “within seven days” if the United States eased military pressure and lifted its blockade of Iranian ports—an operationally short timeline for a unilateral Iranian action contingent on specific U.S. steps. (Reuters/Investing.com coverage).

There is recent precedent for a signed memorandum/framework on Hormuz earlier in 2026: governments reported an MOU in mid‑June 2026 to extend a ceasefire and address Strait transit, showing prior negotiable text and technical teams working on implementation. (Al Jazeera; government DCPD document).

U.S. senior officials (including public remarks by the president and administration spokespeople) have signaled willingness to pursue diplomatic settlement in parallel with continued pressure, indicating some U.S. political space to make short‑term concessions needed to trigger Iranian action. (White House public release; press reporting).

Against

Iran’s stated reopening offer is explicitly conditional on U.S. actions (lifting blockade/easing military pressure and release/unfreezing of assets), demands that are politically and operationally sensitive for the U.S. to implement quickly and publicly within a one‑week window. (Reuters/Investing.com reporting of Sept 22, 2026).

High‑level rhetoric and hardline positions remain public on both sides (including forceful U.S. statements at the UN and Iranian domestic political constraints), increasing the risk that talks produce ambiguous statements instead of a clear, jointly announced diplomatic agreement. (Al Jazeera reporting on UN remarks; White House communications).

A prior mid‑2026 MOU proved fragile: subsequent incidents and disputes over interpretation (including attacks on vessels and disagreements about implementation) led to the July collapse/renewal cycles, demonstrating implementation and mutual‑acceptance are contested. (Coverage of June MOU and subsequent reporting).

Resolution requires a clear, declarative acceptance by both the United States and Iran of the same diplomatic instrument; mediated exchanges or Iran’s conditional offers without a U.S. public acceptance (or vice versa) would not meet the payout criteria even if operational steps followed. (Market rules embedded in the question).

Unknown

Whether the United States will publicly and formally announce the specific, unconditional concessions (e.g., lifting a U.S. naval blockade or formally easing military pressure) that Iran has said it requires—and whether both governments will issue clear, unambiguous acceptance announcements of the same diplomatic instrument—before 11:59 PM ET on September 30, 2026.

What would change A9's mind

  • U.S. public announcement within the window that it will immediately lift or significantly ease the naval blockade/operational restrictions on Iranian ports and set a timeline for reopening shipping (followed by Iran’s declarative acceptance).
  • A joint, mediated press statement (or near‑simultaneous separate statements) by the U.S. and Iran explicitly saying they accept the same written agreement or memorandum on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and listing concrete commitments/timelines.
  • A third‑party mediator (e.g., Qatar/Oman or a GCC consensus) publishes and presents a jointly signed text or confirms both sides’ signatures with corroborating U.S. and Iranian declarations within the deadline.
  • Public reporting (from high‑trust outlets sourcing U.S. and Iranian officials) that both sides have initialed/signed identical diplomatic text and both governments immediately confirm acceptance in clear declarative language.

Probability history

A9 never rewrites the past.

MarketA9Me
7%Initial read

As of Sept 24, 2026 there is credible reporting of renewed, mediated shuttle diplomacy on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and public Iranian statements that Tehran could reopen the Strait of Hormuz within days if the United States eases military pressure and lifts a naval blockade. There is also prior precedent (a June 2026 MOU) and active technical discussions. However, Iran’s offer is explicitly conditional on U.S. actions that are politically and operationally difficult to implement quickly and require clear, public U.S. acceptance of an agreement. The market’s resolution standard demands unambiguous acceptance announcements by both countries of the same diplomatic instrument; that threshold is higher than the existence of mediated talks or conditional offers. Overall the sources show momentum toward diplomacy but also significant political and implementation obstacles that make a clear, jointly announced bilateral diplomatic agreement by Sept 30 uncertain. The single largest uncertainty is whether the U.S. will publicly take the specific steps Iran demands and both sides will issue the unambiguous, matching acceptance statements required by the market within the six‑day window.

a9-predict-0.3.0 · c34d71c7c2a7e8adc675b6d041ca104551cc4e954a4f13d68aeec57e72f21311