A9 PREDICT

A9 Predict

Changelog

Changes associated with this build.
v0.2.0Build identifier supplied

Build date · Eastern: Oct 25, 2026, 1:41:30.352 PM EDT

Technical build details
Commit
ef695042b6cc7b8d0132bc9eb2a0a1890d123d57
Version source
Running build metadata

Build metadata does not confirm production deployment or service health.

v0.2.0 This build

Keep this round's issued prediction readable, with a separate fresh entry comparison when matching evidence is available.

Added

  • One-contract entry estimate from matching fresh forecast, quote, depth and timestamped series fees; no orders are placed.
  • Current Kalshi round, threshold, close countdown and timestamped public quotes, separate from immutable A9 forecasts.
  • Eastern-day count of unique rounds with acknowledged forecasts and saved settlement status; real trades remain unavailable without fills.

Fixed

  • Saved history stays historical, including records from an open round; it does not show a current pick or start quote refreshes.
  • An issued prediction stays visible until its round closes, with its original probability and an explicit stale-input label after freshness expires.
  • Invalid reference timestamps, conflicting records and different-round quotes cannot supply a selection or entry comparison.
  • Forecast-only pilots can use the approved budget while learning stays off.
  • Quotes retire when stale, closed, mismatched or incomplete; an old forecast is never relabeled as current.
  • Bounded response parsing and shared in-flight public reads prevent simultaneous viewers multiplying upstream work.

Changed

  • Target prices spell out At least versus Above from the contract comparison; original Kalshi wording and rules remain in Details.
  • Untracked no-pick counts and the absence of a trading connection are labeled explicitly instead of appearing as a temporary data outage.
  • Canonical ACE9 Living Glass theme, compact historical evidence, and Eastern Time throughout.
  • Accessible version dialog groups Added, Fixed and Changed notes for this exact build.
  • Page reads do not start forecast collection, learning or order execution.

Tracked question

US x China tariff agreement by September 30?

A9 gives this a 94% chance of happening. That's somewhat less likely than the betting market thinks (97%) — a 3-point disagreement. A9 researched this on the web before forecasting.

Market 97%Polymarket
A9 Predict 94%moderate confidence

Jev on its own said 44%

-3 pts vs market
Leans YES

Why A9 thinks this

The evidence, separated.

Web research · quality 60/100

As of 2026-09-26, the United States (White House fact sheet, 2026-09-25) publicly states that the U.S.-China Board of Trade "reached consensus on recommendations" for reciprocal tariff treatment covering roughly $30 billion of non-sensitive goods in each direction. Chinese official channels (MOFCOM) have for months acknowledged negotiation of a $30 billion reciprocal framework and in September 2026 described close consultations and progress, but MOFCOM’s September briefings (and other Chinese statements I was able to find) emphasize ongoing consultation and say progress will be released in due course rather than providing a clear, matching, co-published bilateral agreement text. Additional administrative and customs guidance from U.S. agencies around late September 2026 shows steps consistent with preparing tariff-line changes, but those actions do not by themselves satisfy the market’s requirement for a mutually announced agreement. The core uncertainty is whether, by the market’s deadline (2026-09-30 11:59 PM ET), China will issue a clear matching official announcement or whether credible reporting will form an "overwhelming consensus" that an agreement was reached. Given the U.S. official statement (2026-09-25) and MOFCOM’s acknowledged negotiations, the situation is near an announcement but not unambiguously resolved in public bilateral terms as of 2026-09-26.

For

White House fact sheet (published 2026-09-25) states that, during the Sep 23–25, 2026 state visit, the U.S. and China "reached consensus on recommendations for more favorable tariff treatment for $30 billion of non-sensitive goods in each direction" and says the Board of Trade "reached consensus on recommendations" (official U.S. government announcement).

China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and other Chinese official outlets have publicly acknowledged since spring–summer 2026 that the two sides are negotiating a reciprocal tariff-reduction framework covering roughly USD 30 billion each and have described ongoing consultations and close communication between trade teams (MOFCOM press briefings in September 2026).

U.S. agencies have taken administrative steps consistent with preparing to implement tariff-line changes: government guidance and HTS/Section-301 conforming amendments and CBP bulletin/guidance in late September 2026 discuss implementation mechanics and refunds tied to tariff classification changes (administrative actions that accompany tariff adjustments).

Multiple trade press outlets and legal reporters (Law360, SCMP, trade press) have reported that both sides were negotiating a $30 billion-for-$30 billion reciprocal tariff package and that work had advanced into September 2026 (independent corroboration of substantive negotiations and near-term deliverables).

Against

As of 2026-09-26, I did not find an explicit, standalone official joint announcement issued by the Chinese central government (MOFCOM/Xinhua/State Council) that matches the White House fact sheet language as a mutual, co-published agreement — MOFCOM press briefings in September 2026 describe consultations and "progress to be released in due course," rather than publishing a signed, mutual agreement text.

Several reputable news wires and analysts framed the developments as negotiations, consensus on recommendations, or operationalization of boards rather than as a finalized, mutually announced tariff agreement — reporting emphasizes ongoing work to determine product lists and implementation details.

The White House fact sheet is an authoritative U.S. announcement, but the resolution criteria prioritize a bilateral official announcement by both countries (or an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a mutual agreement). The absence of a clearly identifiable, matching Chinese official press release or jointly issued communique at or before 2026-09-26 therefore argues against immediate, unambiguous resolution to “Yes.”

Administrative changes (HTS/CBP guidance) can reflect U.S. internal implementation steps without proving a finalized mutually announced bilateral agreement; those documents alone do not substitute for a Chinese co-announcement under the market’s resolution rules.

Unknown

Whether the People's Republic of China (MOFCOM, Xinhua, State Council, or other authoritative Chinese central government channel) has issued — by 2026-09-30 11:59 PM ET — an official matching public announcement that confirms the U.S. claim and thereby constitutes a mutual, publicly announced tariff agreement (or whether an overwhelming consensus of credible international reporting will state such a mutual agreement exists).

What would change A9's mind

  • MOFCOM (or another authoritative Chinese central government body) publishes a press release, joint communique, or formal statement explicitly confirming the same reciprocal tariff reductions (including scope/scale or a statement that a mutual tariff agreement has been reached).
  • The U.S. Office of the USTR and a Chinese counterpart jointly publish a communique or matching press release that both parties present as an agreement on reciprocal tariff reductions.
  • Major global wire services (Reuters, AP, Bloomberg) publish coordinated, corroborated reporting quoting senior Chinese officials or official Chinese documents that explicitly confirm a mutual tariff agreement and the reporting is an overwhelming consensus of credible sources.
  • Publication of the concrete implementing legal instruments on both sides (e.g., a Chinese tariff schedule notice and matching U.S. HTS/Section-301 amendment or Presidential/Trade Representative notice) that are announced publicly as the implementation of a bilateral agreement.

Probability history

A9 never rewrites the past.

MarketA9Me
94%Initial read

As of 2026-09-26, the United States (White House fact sheet, 2026-09-25) publicly states that the U.S.-China Board of Trade "reached consensus on recommendations" for reciprocal tariff treatment covering roughly $30 billion of non-sensitive goods in each direction. Chinese official channels (MOFCOM) have for months acknowledged negotiation of a $30 billion reciprocal framework and in September 2026 described close consultations and progress, but MOFCOM’s September briefings (and other Chinese statements I was able to find) emphasize ongoing consultation and say progress will be released in due course rather than providing a clear, matching, co-published bilateral agreement text. Additional administrative and customs guidance from U.S. agencies around late September 2026 shows steps consistent with preparing tariff-line changes, but those actions do not by themselves satisfy the market’s requirement for a mutually announced agreement. The core uncertainty is whether, by the market’s deadline (2026-09-30 11:59 PM ET), China will issue a clear matching official announcement or whether credible reporting will form an "overwhelming consensus" that an agreement was reached. Given the U.S. official statement (2026-09-25) and MOFCOM’s acknowledged negotiations, the situation is near an announcement but not unambiguously resolved in public bilateral terms as of 2026-09-26.

a9-predict-0.3.0 · 34854460acbcbd2ded9d52320c0592d3dd1d422700e232b98f8ed931e09cf800